Make text bigger  Make text smaller  Toggle background color  Bookmark/Share

Gov. Walker Challenges Media Entitlement Reform Narrative

By JAVIER MANJARRES

WalkerWisconsin Governor Scott Walker addressed the National Bloggers Club during a closed-door, invite only event on the last day of CPAC, in which he gave a recap of his speech in from the day before.

Walker said that he “did not buy” the current belief coming from DC pundits who say that “there are groups that Conservatives can reach out to.” Walker then challenged the media narrative that conservatives, entitlement reformists “don’t care about the poor” because of their belief in reform.

We celebrate the fourth of July not April 14, because we celebrate our independence from the government not our dependence of it.

// <![CDATA[
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-8282641051534294"; /* 300x250, created 9/3/10 */ google_ad_slot = "0473781685"; google_ad_width = 300; google_ad_height = 250;
// ]]>
// <![CDATA[

// ]]>


(VIDEO) Santorum: Dems pander for Hispanic votes

BY; JORGE BONILLA

 

rick santorumJavier caught up to former presidential hopeful Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) after his speech at CPAC.  Santorum takes a few minutes to explain why, in his view, Hispanics are a natural fit with the GOP, and how Democrats pander to them.

Click to watch.

// <![CDATA[
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-8282641051534294"; /* 468x60, created 2/28/11 */ google_ad_slot = "7132423922"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60;
// ]]>

// <![CDATA[

// ]]>


Ann Coulter does a 180 on Chris Christie

I suppose Ann must now think it was a good thing that the GOP ignored her advice on making Chris Christie its nominee.


Bill Kristol attacks Rand Paul for running ‘to the left of the Obama administration’ [VIDEO]

Weekly Standard editor argues Paul doesn’t understand GOP’s real strengths


McCain apologizes to Sens. Cruz and Paul for calling them 'wacko birds'

Says he “respects them both.”


Mia Love, take two

Play it again, Sam


Among the many disappointments which came with the elections of 2012, one of the real heartbreak moments for many observers was Mia Love’s race in Utah’s 4th congressional district. After seemingly coming out of nowhere in January of that year, Love surged in both popularity and national profile, even getting a speaking slot at the [...]

Read this post »


Two bad weeks for Obama, in words

Matthew Knee, former LI contributor and now at TargetPoint Consulting, sent this infographic showing what people are saying on “the internet” about Obama the past two weeks.

It’s mostly negative sentiment on several of the most talked about issues (spending cuts, guns, drones, defense, taxes) and slightly positive on jobs and the economy. The big surprises for me were the “women” and “education” topics, which both were very talked about and negative.

The graphic below illustrates the top issues discussed in relation to President Obama over the last two weeks (March 1st-13th), sized by volume and shaded according to average sentiment. This incorporates all mentions from the main (overall) media source, which includes news media, social media (excluding Twitter), and general websites (including the blogosphere).

The greener the bubble, the more positive the issue; the redder the  bubble, the more negative.

Obama’s toughest issues were spending cuts, drones, guns, and assorted foreign policy concerns. The president’s most positive areas, on the other hand, centered around economic concerns and immigration.

(click on image to enlarge)

NDM's ObamaWatch


VIDEO: Where the CPAC ’13 immigration panel went wrong

BY: JORGE BONILLA

 

panelWhen ACU Chair Al Cardenas went on Telemundo’s “Enfoque” and talked about how CPAC would “stimulate” conservatives into taking a deal on immigration, I knew that it would not end well.  I suspected that any discussion of immigration would wrongly focus on style and flexibility on immigration policy, rather than on a commitment to substantive outreach and adherence to First Principles built upon a healthy respect for the Rule of Law.  As you’re about to see, I was sadly proven right.

Comes now my brief video summary of CPAC’s immigration panel, with its inordinate focus on “tone”, “harsh tone”, and “rhetoric”.  Rep. Raúl Labrador (R-ID1) finally shut that mess down an hour into the panel, but by then it was too late.

As I’ve stated before, immigration should not, never, not in a million years be the tip of the spear on Hispanic outreach.  Policy is policy and outreach is outreach. When we try to use policy as outreach, principle ultimately suffers. The inexorable end result is a fruitless pander which results in compromised principles and a loss of credibility.

Furthermore, conservative acquiescence on “tone” constitutes an automatic acceptance of the left’s narrative language…such as, for example, the term “anti-immigrant” as a descriptor of immigration legislation. And as is the case with conservatives and calls for a “new tone”, “new tone” is almost always synonymous with “submission”.

The other day, I discussed Congressman Steve Pearce within that context. If you haven’t already done so, follow the link so that you may also see an alternate approach that will likely yield better results than the old cave-and-pander approach.  Pearce doesn’t do “tone”, and pulled 40+% of the Hispanic vote.

Do note the gentleman on the far end of the panel. That’s Daniel Garza of The Libre Initiative…who refused to get sucked into the harshtone narrative. Instead, Garza rejected those narratives and delivered a stout defense of economic freedom. It would behoove us all to go forth and do likewise.

// <![CDATA[
google_ad_client = "ca-pub-8282641051534294"; /* 468x60, created 2/28/11 */ google_ad_slot = "7132423922"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60;
// ]]>
// <![CDATA[

// ]]>


Bill Maher on California Income Taxes: ‘Liberals – You Could Actually Lose Me’

Well now ain’t this an interesting development? h/t WND


Email: